Thus, the law is joust that each time more is come close to the beginning of rationality and that it originates a legal legislation universal. 3.2 The college of the coercion as a pledge of the individual freedoms in the constitution of the doctrine of the right the apex of the doctrine of the right is the college to coerce. This implies that the right and the college of coercion are non-separable in the kantiano universe. Thus, when somebody tries to hinder outrem to act morally, the right acts as coactive force of the external freedom, that is represented by the state, to annul the offered resistance. In this direction it designates Kant: The opposition to the obstacle of a effect is required by this effect and is in compliance with it. However, everything what it is unjust opposes the freedom, according to general laws.

The resistance is an obstacle rank to the freedom. Soon, if some use of the proper freedom constitutes an obstacle to the freedom, according to general laws (that is, unjust), in this in case that the resistance that if opposes to it, as had destined itself to make to yield the obstacle to the freedom, is in agreement to the freedom according to general laws, that is, that it is joust: for conseguinte the right is non-separable according to contradiction principle, of the college to compel what its is opposed exempts exercise (DD, D). One becomes necessary to mention that it had an apparent referring antinomy the relation of coercion and freedom, that Kant clarifies when emphasizing the nexus between such relations. This discharges in the following questioning: Of that it forms can be conciliated the freedom, that must be respected to fulfill the law legal, with the coercion or coercion, that I possess the right to exert it? (Cf. Bobbio, 1997, p.78). In this perspective, the right is a freedom ' ' limitada' ' in virtue of the existence of the other people’s freedom.