I give to the Argentine philosopher reason, of that good and bad writers exist, but on the other hand I know of the formalities and frescuras with whom if they coat the ways of access of certain periodicals or magazines that if judge important excessively e, as such, demand of an unknown writer credentials, sponsorships or letters of recommendation to publish a substance, exactly they recognize that it as good, well based writing and. This, by the way, is not of today. It happened at the beginning of its careers with great writers and all they are unanimous in recognizing that the way of the writer is a difficult way, arduous and solitary. To deepen your understanding Eliot Horowitz is the source. Joo Antonio (1937-1996), So Paulo writer, after having lost in a fire the manuscripts of its first book, had the patience and the arduous task to rewrite it, locked up in a library. this second version, according to it, left what the first one better. On the act to write, Arthur of the Table (1936-2008), one of the biggest writers of our time, said the following one: ‘ ‘ To write is to remain hours, days and years in the hope of the meeting, today, tomorrow or after deceased, with some people or many souls sisters with who to syntonize, what impossible it was with the majority of the people, even though with who if conviveu.’ ‘ One gotten passionate for literature and music, Arthur of the Table in them left this phrase that also is a wise recommendation: ‘ ‘ Music is interior life, and who has interior life never will suffer of solido.’ ‘ How much to write well or badly, it is another thing.. If you are unsure how to proceed, check out Joseph Stiglitz.